• LAST PRICE
    10.5900
  • TODAY'S CHANGE (%)
    Trending Down-0.1100 (-1.0280%)
  • Bid / Lots
    10.5900/ 1
  • Ask / Lots
    10.6300/ 1
  • Open / Previous Close
    10.6400 / 10.7000
  • Day Range
    Low 10.4400
    High 10.7300
  • 52 Week Range
    Low 7.7900
    High 11.7000
  • Volume
    504,551
    average

Search Criteria

Filter search criteria using below inputs

Click on magnifying glass icon to search

Search Criteria - - - Stocks (0)
CompanyCountrySymbol

TD Direct Investing offers more research reports than any other discount brokerage in Canada. Provided from the industry's most trusted sources, our service includes timely, relevant information for the current trading day and comprehensive industry, sector, and insider trading reports for further analysis.

Open a New Account, or Login if you're a client.

  • Today

      Show headlines and story abstract
    • 10 hours ago by GlobeNewswire
      Companies Mentioned: SASKF, DPMLF
    • 10 hours ago by Dow Jones
      Companies Mentioned: DPM
      would be required to produce a current mineral resource estimate prepared in accordance with NI 43-101. 2. Notes on the Historical Mineral Resource Estimate for the Moran Lake Deposit: 1. Jeffrey A. Morgan, P.Geo. and Gary H. Giroux, P.Eng. completed a NI 43-101 technical report titled "Form 43-101F1 Technical Report on the Central Mineral Belt (CMB) Uranium Project, Labrador, Canada, Prepared for Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp." and dated July 31, 2008, with an updated mineral resource estimate for the Moran Lake C-Zone along with initial mineral resources for the Armstrong and Area 1 deposits. They modelled three packages in the Moran Lake Upper C-Zone (the Upper C Main, Upper C Mylonite, and Upper C West), Moran Lake Lower C-Zone, two packages in Armstrong (Armstrong Z1 and Armstrong Z3), and Trout Pond. These mineral resources are based on 3D block models with ordinary kriging used to interpolate grades into 10 m x 10 m x 4 m blocks. A cut-off grade of 0.015% U3O8 was used for all zones other than the Lower C Zone which employed a cut-off grade of 0.035%. A thorough review of all historical data performed by a Qualified Person, along with additional exploration work to confirm results, would be required to produce a current mineral resource estimate prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards. 3. Notes on the Historical Mineral Resource Estimate for the Anna Lake Deposit: 1. The mineral resource estimate contained in this table is considered to be a "historical estimate" as defined under NI 43-101, and is not considered to be current and is not being treated as such. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources. A qualified person would need to review and verify the scientific information and conduct an analysis and reconciliation of historical drill and geological data in order to verify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource. 2. Reported by Bayswater Uranium Corporation in a Technical Report entitled "Form 43-101 Technical Report on the Anna Lake Uranium Project, Central Mineral Belt, Labrador, Canada", prepared by R. Dean Fraser, P.Geo. and Gary H. Giroux, P.Eng., dated September 30, 2009. 3. A 3-dimensional geologic model of the deposit was created for the purpose of the resource estimate using the Gemcom/Surpac modeling software. A solid model was created using a minimum grade x thickness cutoff of 3 meters grading 0.03% U3O8. Intersections not meeting this cutoff were generally not incorporated into the model. The shell of this modeled zone was then used to constrain the mineralization for the purpose of the block model. Assay composites 2.5 meters in length that honoured the mineralized domains were used to interpolate grades into blocks using ordinary kriging. An average specific gravity of 2.93 was used to convert volumes to tonnes. The specific gravity data was acquired in-house and consisted of an average of seventeen samples collected from the mineralised section of the core. The resource was classified into Measured, Indicated or Inferred using semi-variogram ranges applied to search ellipses. All resources estimated at Anna Lake fall under the "Inferred" category due to the wide spaced drill density. An exploration program would need to be conducted, including twinning of historical drill holes in order to verify the Anna Lake Project estimate as a current mineral resource.
  • Jun 12, 2024

  • Jun 11, 2024

Peers Headlines